Advertisement

Large vs. Big

topic posted Fri, February 19, 2010 - 7:49 AM by  "Chance" aka
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
There are some words out there that all mean the same thing.... or do they? What is the diference between Large, Big, Gigantic, Huge, Collosal, Etc.? Which one is bigger? Let's define these words and others that similarly describe "Bigness". When we've exhausted that list, then we can go on to words discribing "smallness" like Tiny or Miniscule. And then other words. I'll start with Large. This is just a guess on my part. I haven't done any research. I'm thinking that Large is used for describing an item that comes in various sizes and have been previouisly clasified into size catigories. For example, If you went into McDonalds and said, 'Man, look at the size of that drink! It sure is large." you would be wrong if it was actually a small or medium or extra-large drink. Don't use Large to describe your oppinion, but rather an established fact. But if this were true all the time, we would not have the words Larger and Largest.
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Large vs. Big

    Fri, February 19, 2010 - 9:23 AM
    I wholeheartedly agree. Large and big and gigantic and huge do NOT mean the same thing.

    I think the best way to get to the root of it is to look at opposites.

    Small and Big – are these opposites? When you're in kindergarten you're taught they are. Sesame Street teaches you they are. But I tend to think Little is the opposite of Big. First you're a Little kid, then you're a Big kid – but you may still be small. Big can mean stature, but it can also mean age. Big brother as opposed to Little brother.

    Small and Large – I think these are the correct opposite pairing. Although it's not so much "opposites" really as it is a comparison. A size small is not really opposite of size large. It's just smaller. Large and small should be used for sizes or amounts. A large sum of money, a small shoe.

    Giant has to be stature. I don't know what it's opposite would be. My brain is leaning towards "dwarf" but I think that may be due to fantasy and lore which tells me giants are THINGS, not descriptions. Giant is larger than large – but it should more often actually mean *taller*. Like, if someone outweighs me by a couple hundred pounds but is the same height, I can't really call that person giant. It could also mean "longer." My husband has "giant" shoes, they're double the size of mine in length. But you wouldn't call a stretch limousine giant in comparison to a normal car… it's just longer.

    Huge – man, English has too many words. What sets huge aside from the others is that it's a comparison of amount, not size, not stature, not age. A gallon is huge compared to an ounce of the same liquid. The beach is huge is comparison to a toddler's sandbox. In both examples, you could say "bigger than," but that could also imply just a larger sandbox or more than an ounce. Unfortunately, people use huge in my previous example that I used for giant. A person should not be called huge, but a waistline, a pair of jeans, a body mass amount could be. Huge almost requires an exponential difference. If I were a mathematician, I'd create the formula for huge.
  • Re: Large vs. Big

    Sat, February 20, 2010 - 8:29 PM
    I think "medium grande" is funny. Medium big? lol

    Small, medium or large -- I'm pretty sure that when it comes to food or beverages, the sizes have changed in the past 20 years. Which is why when I order a beverage nowadays, I always ask for no ice ("No hielo por favor"). Lack of ice increases the volume of my drink!

    When it comes to people, small, medium or large can refer to the size of their hearts, their heads, their breasts, their dicks, their mouths, their feet, etc. With some people, size matters. When it comes to clothing and shoes, size certainly does matter a lot.

    Humongous and gargantuan are two of my favorite words for truly big things. Big like in leviathan. Or aircraft carrier.

    Colossal referred to things as big as a column (architecture). Gargantuan was coined after the ravenous Rabelais character, Gargantua. Humongous is a newish word and means big. How big? As big as you can imagine.
    • Re: Large vs. Big

      Sun, February 21, 2010 - 6:47 AM
      Me, I'm personally fond of "big-ish" and "large-ish."
      • Re: Large vs. Big

        Sun, February 21, 2010 - 6:51 PM
        First I want to reply to several comments that Duck made. Most of these words don't have an opposite, so I don't think that helps. I don't think big and little have anything to do with age. I think your wrong in saying that you can be a small big kid. The phrase "big brother" is not acurate and should be "older brother". It is only said out of habbit because at a young age, the older brother is a bigger brother. The word Giant is a noun and you should say that a man is "a giant" not that he is "giant". You could say that he is "giant-like in stature" which is I think the definition of Gigantic. So how about "Dwarfgantic"? I disagree that Huge is just for ammounts. Now I want to reply to Babe's comments.. The thing I find frustrating about the names for drink sizes is this. Medium should be the middle size offered. How can they offer three sizes called Medium, Large, and Extra-large? If only two sizes are offered, they should be Small and Large. If three- Small, Medium, and Large. If four- that's a tough one. Either add an Extra-small or an extra-large, or add both and get rid of the menium. If five- Extra-small, small, medium, large, and Extra-large. If Six- Why would you need six or more? Are you sure about the origins of Colossal and Gargantuan? This is the kind of difinitive answers I was hoping for, so thank you. However, I would have thought that the monster was named after the adjective and not the other way around.

Recent topics in "Word Freaks"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Stephen Spielberg's Word Tricks. Adastra 6 April 26, 2013
Contradictions DuckAmuck 4 April 20, 2013
"Stink" JM 5 March 9, 2013
Words that have a remarkable etymology dr mork 0 January 25, 2013